Silver Screener: So here we are
again, another year, another Oscar race.
March King: And the competition's
pretty fierce. It's nice to see a year so evenly matched across the board.
SS: And by evenly matched you
mean....
MK: Well I can think of five films
I'd be okay with winning best picture, two best actors, three supporting
actors, three best actresses, two supporting actresses, two animated
features... basically any category you look at I have multiple favorites. That
is not a regular year for me. In most years previous I have had decided
champions in my mind for every category, but the Oscar season has been quite
good to us.
SS: Ok, I would agree with that. I
was just surprised to hear you say it! I know you were disappointed with some
of the snubs. But of course, now I’m curious to hear your five, two, three,
three, two.
MK: Well yes, the omissions have been
somewhat surprising in my mind.
You know what they say, "Unlucky at Awards Ceremonies, lucky at women and men and transgenders and... well you get the point." |
But that doesn't take away from the ceremony.
Now we know where the Academy is coming from in relation to the year. And it
makes for an interesting demographic of performers and creators, no question.
Let's start with writing, shall we? In original screenplay, I have to say
Midnight in Paris and The Artist both stand a very good shot of taking the
gold.
SS: It's going to be The Artist. I
just feel so certain about it. I'd love for it to be Midnight in Paris, but I
think overall love for the former will see it win in the Big Four.
MK: Trends do seem to be in that
direction. So we move on. In adapted screenplay I have three in mind.
SS: Move on already? What about
personal picks, shoulda beens, opinions on the individual nominees?
MK: (laughs) I feel like we're going
to be covering Woody and Michel again pretty quickly. Do you have someone else
in mind that you'd like to see get it?
SS: ...no. But I wish Diablo Cody was
nominated for Young Adult.
She didn't wake up in time and missed the whole FYC campaign. |
MK: Agreed agreed. I find it a sad
omission, one of many. But the more I talk to people on the subject of Young
Adult, the more negativity I hear. I disagree, but popular opinion seems to be
against her.
SS: I still haven't seen A Separation
or Margin Call.
MK: Neither have I sadly. But only so
many hours in the day.
SS: Hm. Well, then, adapted. You have
three possible winners or three you'd like to see win?
MK: Three I'd be okay with... Tinker
Tailor Soldier Spy, Moneyball, and The Ides of March. And in that order.
SS: Wha--YES! YES EXACTLY! Exactly
that order, exactly those three. Hugo and Descendants are waaaaay further down
in the quality field.
MK: (laughs) They are. I'm left
wondering what was ignored that should have been there... The Help perhaps?
SS: Eh.
MK: The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo?
SS: Eh.
MK: Jane Eyre?
SS: Never saw it. Maybe?
MK: Maybe. While I've never read the
book, I have been told that it is the most interesting adaptation of that
particular story to date.
SS: Maybe. I wouldn't know. Extremely
Loud and Incredibly Close was a great movie. That's a nomination I'd've liked
to see.
MK: Absolutely! Not quite enough love
for that film.
At least he's got his mother's love. |
But none-the-less... Sorkin is a god and Tinker Tailor was just
a piece of mastery. I'd also like to see George get some recognition for his
quite potent ability to captain the film ship in every aspect of the
production.
SS: But we know that's not gonna
happen. In my dreams, Tinker Tailor surprises in much the same way Precious did
two years ago.
MK: Mmm... that would be a very nice
surprise. VFX? I say Rise of the Planet of the Apes.
SS: I can see this being the category
where they give a shout-out to the Harry Potter films. It's inconceivable that
they haven't won a single award after all this time, and it's not going to be
Art Direction or Makeup.
MK: Perhaps, but in my mind Potter
doesn't even touch on how perfectly those Apes were crafted. This is one of the
few categories that just seems like an easy choice to me.
SS: I’d agree, yes, but sometimes
what I think is the best (in this case, Apes) doesn't match the Academy's. Like
The Golden Compass.
MK: It's true. No denying, at the
Oscars, nothing is ever definite.
SS: And then there's Hugo, which
leads the pack with 11 nominations. It's got good chances of winning, too.
MK: Well yes, odds would say it'll
take something away from this... but I just feel it's beaten in practically
every category.
SS: I see Hugo winning one category,
definitely, and maybe two others (besides this).
MK: You're probably right, though it
pains me to say so.
SS: You'd even begrudge it Original
Score? The music in that movie is magical, in a way few movie scores are.
Listen to it coming off an escalator at the metro station...as the buildings
start to rise into view...yeah. And in context, it's still great! So let's
discuss Original Score and how my love of Alberto Iglesias' Tinker Tailor work
is deep, but not as deep as my love of Howard Shore's Hugo.
MK: (laughs) Well no one's denying
Howard Shore's abilities. The man is responsible for some incredible stuff. He
could win for Hugo, but that's probably the only win I'd be on board with.
Still Iglesias did a phenomenal job!
SS: Agreed! My second choice! But
HUGO, man! HUGO! It doesn't matter anyway, because this category will also
belong to The Artist.
MK: The Artist. Could it really be
the powerhouse everybody's painting it out to be?
SS: Yes. It's wins at various Guilds
and BAFTAs show strong support within the industry. I don't think it's going to
win all its nominations, but it would be foolish not to think the silent movie
is going to win Original Score. The music is its only constant aural quality,
and while the Vertigo controversy may hurt it a little, it won't be enough to
make a difference.
MK: Okay, well then let's talk about
this for a second. Hazanavicius constructed something baffling to most modern
day audiences. He brought us a silent film... a good silent film (I'm not
denying), but still it's a work that... oddly enough... relies on a gimmick. My
thought here is, Woody's Midnight in Paris makes us feel similar things...
brings us back to the past, makes us want to remember a time we couldn’t
possibly know... and he does it all... and in my opinion better... without that
gimmick. He just made a great movie. What's funny is we all assume the silent
gimmick would weaken any ordinary movie, but in viewing The Artist, people
still love the film. But maybe it doesn't weaken a film... maybe people just
decided to actually watch this particular one because it was a "new"
(old) idea. Something they weren't used to.
SS: Maybe, like anything, nothing can
weaken a film as long as the film is actually good.
MK: I can't remember the last
"main stream" silent. Maybe Mel Brooks' Silent Movie?
SS: That would be it, yeah.
MK: (laughs) Damn. I guess I'm just
wrapped up in Woody love.
SS: I think Midnight in Paris should
win Best Pic, but I don't think it's going to happen.
MK: Yeah. But here's to hoping. So
let's talk editing for a moment...
SS: Ooh, now that's a category I
always have trouble with. Sometimes they go for the action flicks, sometimes
they go for the Best Pic frontrunner, sometimes they actually make the right call.
MK: My pick would be Dragon Tattoo.
But I'd be happy with Moneyball, The Artist, or even The Descendants. Hugo is
the one awkward one for me. The inconsistencies of the editing frequently
pulled me out of the movie.
SS: Man, fuck The Descendants.
The
editing was part of the tonal inconsistency, flat narrative, and draggy pace.
Fuck that.
(Laughs)
MK: Yet somehow it made it in over
Tinker Tailor... I say they should have given it to Undefeated actually... or
is a documentary ineligible for some insane reason?
SS: No, doc is eligible. It just
doesn't always happen. The Artist, now, that's the award it should win, no
doubt about it. It could’ve lost to Drag Tat or Moneyball, but the editing in
The Artist keeps it ebullient, allows it to transition to the more dramatic
section with ease.
MK: True. Those three could all take
it to me. I guess my dislikes about The Descendants weren't completely based on
the editing. I think there were greater woes to that overall film. But
anyway... I missed every foreign language nominee... but can't believe The Skin
I Live In was ignored. Those had better be some excellent flicks to win out
SS: Most of them haven't been
released, I believe. Footnote, In Darkness....limited for Bullhead and A
Separation....I don’t know what Lazhar is.
MK: Yeah, it's a shame they never get
those out in time for us to see. I feel like I always miss at least two in that
category.
SS: Well, generally they're held on
purpose so they can use the nomination/win in their marketing. It's much easier
for foreign language films to get noticed that way, especially if they're more
arthouse fare or don't boast known Auteurs.
MK: Hmm, so the tag "Currently
Nominated" wouldn't carry some interest? Like, "Hey guys. If you want
to actually care about the awards show, here's an interesting way to do
that."
SS: When English-language Oscar
nominees are still in theaters? Think about it.
English-language Best Picture
nominees?
MK: I am, but January and February
are routinely slow months at the movies anyway. Maybe that's the time for films
like these to steal a little attention.
SS: Well, A Separation is, and look
how that's doing.
MK: But it's such a limited release.
Designated to the Laemmle annex.
SS: It would absolutely get killed in
a wider market. If our theaters don't have it, it's because our theaters don't
want it.
MK: Too bad. I think they'd make more
money than they realize.
SS: No. They wouldn’t. Asking the
average American to see a movie from Iran? Absolutely not.
MK: Paradise Now got its self an
audience.
SS: Paradise Now had more
controversial, timely subject matter and A Separation has already made almost
twice what Paradise Now made. Paradise Now didn't have an audience so much as
it had talking points. as much as I heard about Paradise Now, I don't remember
meeting anyone who saw it, or reading any reviews.
MK: It was... not amongst my
favorites. (laughs)
SS: A Separation probably won't win
anyway, because it's rare that the Big One does.
MK: Ex. Pan's Labyrinth.
SS: It's probably going to be
Footnote or Monsieur Lazhar.
MK: But a separation has a nomination
for screenplay as well. That's kind of a big deal. Truly rare.
SS: I will give you the screenplay
nom. All I know is, when we had Incendies in Boca, we had to avoid discussing
the Middle Eastern aspect of the story (which is the WHOLE THING) because to
mention a non-Israeli Middle Eastern movie was to mention THE DEVIL HIMSELF.
MK: (laughs) But we're in Hollywood
and I've seen surprising movies take off in this market. Honestly it's
difficult to know what will make it here. I've seen tiny moves thrive and
massive movies flop... hard. The film-going culture is changing
and sometimes it's just worth making
an actual push.
SS: If you can afford it.
Sorry folks. We got a little carried away. The rest of the conversation will be up shortly in The Silver Screening Room.